Jinnah was against Vande Mataram: Modi's speech in Lok Sabha and controversy over 150-year-old national song
The debate
on the 150th anniversary of the national song 'Vande Mataram' began in the Lok
Sabha on Monday with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech. In his speech, Modi
mentioned Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Muhammad Ali Jinnah and said
that injustice has been done to 'Vande Mataram'.
During his
speech, Modi said that the Muslim League was opposing 'Vande Mataram' and on
October 15, 1937, Jinnah raised a slogan against it from Lucknow.
According to
him, instead of responding to Jinnah's objections, Nehru himself started
examining 'Vande Mataram' and wrote a letter to Subhash Chandra Bose that the
background of the song could incite Muslims.
Modi alleged
that on October 26, the Congress Working Committee decided to review the use of
'Vande Mataram', which was done under pressure from the Muslim League.
According to him, this was the result of 'appeasement politics' which later
paved the way for the partition of India.
Modi
referred to Gandhi's 1905 essay in which he declared 'Vande Mataram' as the
national anthem and said that the song awakens patriotism.
The Prime
Minister also mentioned the Emergency and said that when the song turned 100,
the country was in the chains of Emergency. He said that 'Vande Mataram' gave
energy to the freedom movement and today is the time to highlight its greatness
again.
While
Congress leader Guru Gogoi said that it was the Congress that gave the status
of 'Vande Mataram' as the national song and rejected the objections of the
Muslim League.
He reminded that it was decided in the Constituent Assembly that 'Jana Guna Mana' would be the national anthem and 'Vande Mataram' would be the national son
The ‘Vande Mataram’ anthem in India has been controversial since its inception.
It is an
anthem that has been the subject of controversy from time to time, but since
the BJP came to power, the dispute between the ruling party and the opposition
on this issue has continued.
The BJP has
accused the Congress of targeting important parts of the song during the
freedom struggle, while the Congress calls these allegations baseless.
On this
occasion, several BJP leaders are also demanding that the singing of this song
be made compulsory in educational institutions.
Several
opposition parties, including the Samajwadi Party, are opposing it and are
arguing that the anthem should not be made compulsory.
This song
was written by Bankam Chandra Chatterjee in Bengali and Sanskrit in 1875.
Bankam later
included this song in his famous but controversial work ‘Anand Math’ (1885).
Last
November, while inaugurating the 150th anniversary celebrations of ‘Vande
Mataram’, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had alleged that the Congress party had
‘deleted some important parts of Vande Mataram’ before the 1937 Faizabad
session.
He then said
that ‘in 1937, some important lines of Vande Mataram, which were part of its
spirit, were removed. Vande Mataram was broken. Why was this injustice done? It
sowed the seeds of division.’
BJP
spokesperson Sambit Patra also alleged that Nehru was ‘not comfortable’ with
‘Vande Mataram’.
In response
to these allegations, Congress spokesperson Jairam Ramesh posted on Instagram,
citing a book on Vande Mataram written by Sabya Saachi Bhattacharya, saying,
"Three days before the Congress Working Committee meeting in 1937, Gurudev
Rabindranath Tagore himself wrote to Nehru about it. He was personally attached
to Vande Mataram, and suggested that the first two stanzas be adopted. Inspired
by his letter at the meeting, now Prime Minister Narendra Modi is accusing
Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore of having divisive views."
Yogi
government's decision and its opposition
Furthermore,
on November 10, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath announced that his
government would make the singing of 'Vande Mataram' mandatory in schools,
colleges and educational institutions in the state.
On November
11, during a program to mark the 150th anniversary of Vande Mataram in
Barabanki district, he said, “Whoever opposes Vande Mataram is opposing Bharat
Mata (Mother India).
He added,
“Even today, there are some people who will live in India, eat in India, but
will not sing Vande Mataram.”
Responding
to this, Samajwadi Party President Akhilesh Yadav said in Bareilly on November
13: “When the Chief Minister’s chair starts shaking, he becomes communal.”
He said, “We
are having this debate today, didn’t the framers of the Constitution discuss it
at that time, that’s why they gave the national anthem and the national song,
if it was necessary for them to sing it, why wasn’t it made mandatory, they
left it to the people’s choice.”
What is the history of ‘Vande Mataram’?
Bankum
Chandra Chatterjee (1838-1894) was the first Indian to be appointed Deputy
Collector after the British annexed the Indian colonies in 1858 by the Queen of
England.
He retired
in 1891 and was awarded several titles by the British rulers, including ‘Rai
Bahadur’.
He wrote
this song in Bengali and Sanskrit in 1875. Bankum later included it in his
famous but controversial work ‘Anand Math’ (1885).
An
interesting fact about this song is that all the symbols and scenes mentioned
in it are related to the land of Bengal.
In this
song, Bankum also mentions seven crore people, which was the total population
of the province of Bengal (which included Orissa and Bihar) at that time.
Similarly, when Aurobindo Ghosh translated it, he titled it ‘The National
Anthem of Bengal’.
Rabindranath
Tagore had also composed a beautiful tune for this song.
The
partition of Bengal truly made this song the national anthem of Bengal. The
public outrage against the partition of Bengal by the British government in
1905 made this song, especially its chorus, a weapon against the British.
Then, the
participants in the freedom movement, including both Hindus and Muslims, used
this song extensively in their protests against the British rule.
When the
British army brutally attacked the provincial session of the Bengal Congress in
Barisal (now in Bangladesh) under the chairmanship of farmer leader M. Rasool
for singing the poem ‘Vande Mataram’, the slogan ‘Vande Mataram’ spread like
wildfire throughout Bengal. Overnight, it began to resonate not only in Bengal
but also throughout the country.
Freedom
fighters like Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Rajguru, Ram Prasad Bismil, and
Ashfaqullah Khan also raised the slogan ‘Vande Mataram’.
The slogan,
like ‘Inquilab Zindabad’, became a mantra of shared nationalism. By the second
decade of the 20th century, the anti-British national movement had taken on a
nationwide form.
Objections
and solutions
In 1937, the
Congress, which led the independence movement, formed a committee consisting of
Gandhi, Nehru, Abul Kalam Azad and Subhash Chandra Bose to prevent partition,
which invited public objections to the song.
The biggest
objection was that the song defined Indian nationalism in terms of a particular
religion. This question was raised not only by Muslim organizations but also by
Sikh, Jain, Christian and Buddhist organizations.
With the
recognition of 'Vande Mataram' as the national song of the country along with
the national anthem 'Jan Gun Man', a controversy arose about it.
Muslim
scholars said that since this song talks about bowing down to the mountains,
rivers and land of the country, Muslims cannot sing this song because they can
only bow down to God.
After much
debate, the scholars decided that Muslims can sing the first two stanzas of
Vande Mataram. These are the two stanzas that are actually sung during
celebrations.
Unlike the
national anthem 'Jan Gun Man', this national song is not remembered by most
people and is rarely sung. But due to opposition from scholars and various
fatwas, this song has become increasingly popular in the last few years.
However, the RSS and the Hindu Mahasabha demanded the adoption of the entire
song, while the Muslim League opposed the entire song.
In India, a
section of the public often raises slogans like 'If you want to live in India,
you have to say Bande Mataram', which is synonymous with provocation and,
according to some, a violation of religious freedom.






0 Comments